The Medical Letter on Drugs and Therapeutics
FROM
ISSUE
1437
In Brief: Testosterone and Cardiovascular Risk
Download PDF:   US English
Med Lett Drugs Ther. 2014 Mar 3;56(1437):17
Disclosures
Objective(s)
 Select a term to see related articles  Cialis   PDE5 inhibitor   sildenafil   tadalafil   Testosterone   Viagra 
Read our blog post on this topic:  Testosterone Replacement Therapy

Prompted by the recent publication of 2 retrospective studies, the FDA has announced that it is investigating the risk of stroke, heart attack, and death in men taking FDA-approved testosterone products.1

The first study examined the records of 8709 men with low testosterone levels (<300 ng/dL) who underwent coronary angiography between 2005 and 2011; 1223 of these men started testosterone therapy after a median of 531 days following coronary angiography. Three years after coronary angiography, the Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative percentages of men who died or had a myocardial infarction (MI) or ischemic stroke were 26% of those treated with testosterone and 20% of those who were not treated with the hormone, a hazard ratio of 1.29 (95% CI 1.04-1.58; P=0.02).2

The second study compared the rate of nonfatal MI during the 90 days after filling a prescription with the rate in the prior year in 56,000 men given a prescription for testosterone and in 167,000 given a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (sildenafil [Viagra] or tadalafil [Cialis]). In the testosterone group as a whole, the post/pre-prescription rate ratio was 1.36, but in men ≥65 years old it was 2.19 and in younger men with a history of heart disease it was 2.90. In men who received a prescription for sildenafil or tadalafil, the rate ratio was 1.08 for all ages, 1.15 for those ≥65 years old, and 1.40 for younger men with a history of heart disease.3

A recent meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials of testosterone therapy also found an increased risk of cardiovascular-related events in men treated with the hormone (odds ratio [OR] 1.54; 95% CI 1.09-2.18); an analysis by funding source found that the risk was greater in trials not funded by the pharmaceutical industry (OR 2.06 vs. 0.89).4

© The Medical Letter, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The Medical Letter, Inc. does not warrant that all the material in this publication is accurate and complete in every respect. The Medical Letter, Inc. and its editors shall not be held responsible for any damage resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission.
This article has been freely provided.
arrow to previous article
arrow to next article